🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents praising your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content appear to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers encountered positive results. One writer who changed both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to unofficial tests where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."